Re:Can't pay, won't pay: streaming services are driving view...
by zerocrates on Thursday August 14, 2025 @11:38PM
(#44908381)
The collapse being the collapse of the DDR? The Lives of Others must have been made way further beyond that than 7 years. Closer to 20, I'd figure.
Re:Can't pay, won't pay: streaming services are driving view...
by arrowsmith on Thursday August 14, 2025 @11:45PM
(#44908410)
TLOO came out in 2006, 16 years after the DDR collapsed.
I wondered if GP was thinking of another movie so I asked ChatGPT, which told me: "The German film you’re thinking of is "Good Bye, Lenin!" — released in 2003, exactly seven years after the formal end of the DDR in 1990." (My emphasis.)
So much for GPT-5.
Re:Can't pay, won't pay: streaming services are driving view...
by qrios on Friday August 15, 2025 @12:09AM
(#44908520)
Right, I missed a whole decade. (For me 1989, the Mauerfall is the official end of GDR)
Re:Can't pay, won't pay: streaming services are driving view...
by irthomasthomas on Friday August 15, 2025 @02:19AM
(#44909167)
That's hilarious. Imagine going back two years and showing someone GPT-5? They might think the Pause AI movement had won. It makes you ponder an alternate timeline where the OpenAI brain trust wasn't dismantled
Which version did you use, though? GPT-5, GPT-5-Thinking, GPT-5 Pro, GPT-5-Mini, GPT-5 with Thinking (reasoning effort=high) or one of the other 18 options? Did you tell it to think harder? Maybe you are just holding it wrong?
Re:Can't pay, won't pay: streaming services are driving view...
by bambax on Friday August 15, 2025 @12:41PM
(#44914551)
Making what is essentially a router dispatching queries to the smallest engine susceptible to answer a question was maybe a good optimization from a techical and business pont of view.
But branding that router "GPT5" is a huge marketing mistake, because now, every time a smaller model says something stupid (as they often do), it seems that's the best OpenAI has to offer...
Re:Can't pay, won't pay: streaming services are driving view...
by GoblinSlayer on Friday August 15, 2025 @04:06AM
(#44909755)
Linguistically it's an ok association. If you look at it unconsciously, you can find it plausible too, add 7 but in reverse.
Re:Can't pay, won't pay: streaming services are driving view...
by boredhedgehog on Friday August 15, 2025 @04:09AM
(#44909773)
GPT-5 fell into a coma and missed a few critical years.
Re:Can't pay, won't pay: streaming services are driving view...
by nkrisc on Friday August 15, 2025 @07:31AM
(#44911057)
A perfectly grammatical and plausible sentence. Those words all seem quite likely to occur in that sequence. Another LLM success.
Re:Can't pay, won't pay: streaming services are driving view...
by tclancy on Saturday August 16, 2025 @02:14PM
(#44925708)
I’m confused. It was a great movie and wildly applicable to what the right wants to do to the US now. What is too late?
I mean it may be too late to save us/US but it still bears saying.
US-America has looked at the subject of surveillance of its own population and its own (possible) collapse many times and often in a timely manner.
"The Conversation": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Conversation
"Enemy of the State": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enemy_of_the_State_(film)
"The Siege": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Siege
"In the Heat of the Night": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_the_Heat_of_the_Night_(film...
"Eagle Eye": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eagle_Eye
If you ask publicly, ‘What if I've seen XYZ?’ then it's actually already too late.