I dunno who downmodded you but it wasn't me. I suspect it was your use of quotes around evaluating.
If your friends are targetting web output, GIMP may be perfectly adequate.
If your friends are targetting web output, GIMP may be perfectly adequate.
I was curious, that's all. I'm not a image-manipulation person (the largest amount of image-manipulation I've done involved porting an algorithm to do some stuff from C++ to python), only have cursory experience with both Photoshop and the GIMP, but have heard both "It's no replacement!" and "It's a perfectly good replacement" from people I know who do have a lot of experience with image-manipulation.
I know, for instance, that the interface is wildly different than photoshop's, and was curious as to how much time you had invested into examining it.