Ask HN: Good Hacker Cities

Re:Ask HN: Good Hacker Cities by tptacek on Sunday January 25, 2009 @02:26AM (#448878)

So if you lived in Oakland and your best job opportunity was in Santa Clara on Great America Parkway, what's the convenient way you'd get to work without a 45 minute car ride? Or for that matter Sunnyvale, or even Pleasanton?

There are obviously lots of good reasons to live in SF/bay, but transportation really doesn't seem like one of them. What am I missing?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Ask HN: Good Hacker Cities by gojomo on Sunday January 25, 2009 @02:50AM (#448895)

Santa Clara is not anywhere along the "Fremont to SF" easy-access claim of drsnyder.

If you want to live in Oakland and don't like a 45-minute car commute, you don't take a job in Santa Clara or Sunnyvale.

Oakland to Pleasanton should be reasonable by BART.

The Bay Area can't compare to the USA's best train-centric cities (NY, Chicago, Boston) but beats most other domestic places for mass transit. Still, it's spotty, with some great corridors and some journeys that are really hard.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Ask HN: Good Hacker Cities by aaronblohowiak on Sunday January 25, 2009 @05:52AM (#449016)

Fun historical factoid: LA used to have a world-class train system! Good luck with its public transport now, though... "I'd have to take 5 busses and it would take 3 hours? To get groceries?"

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Ask HN: Good Hacker Cities by gravitycop on Sunday January 25, 2009 @06:01AM (#449024)

LA used to have a world-class train system

It was just a movie. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pacific_Electric#The_.22General...

Other factors that may have contributed to the decline of electric traction in the United States include [...] low revenues.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Ask HN: Good Hacker Cities by steveplace on Sunday January 25, 2009 @09:48AM (#449137)

Don't forget:

The plot of the 1988 movie Who Framed Roger Rabbit is loosely modeled on the conspiracy to dismantle the streetcar lines in Los Angeles.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Ask HN: Good Hacker Cities by menloparkbum on Sunday January 25, 2009 @06:33PM (#449713)

Unless you work in the East Bay, Oakland is a bad place to live for a hacker, simply because the commute to other parts of the bay is very inconvenient. My advice for people who don't know the area is: don't live in the east bay unless you also work in the east bay.

Most hacker jobs are in the south bay, followed by the peninsula and the city. The commute from the east bay to the south bay is painful, much more so than from the city to the south bay.

If you work in the city, you can take BART, but the convenience of BART depends on how close you live to a station. Berkeley/Oakland residential areas are much more spread out than SF. It isn't unlikely that the station is a 30 minute walk from your house.

When I lived in the east bay and worked in SOMA I had to walk 30 minutes to BART, then BART for about 30 minutes, then another 20 minute walk on the SF side. Now I live in the city and work in the same area of SOMA and I can get there in 15 minutes on the train or a 40 minute walk. I don't even want to talk about when I lived in the east bay and had to drive to Cupertino. What a driving nightmare...

In summary, Oakland is NOT a great hacker city unless you can do your hacking on that side of the bay...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Ask HN: Good Hacker Cities by jjs on Sunday January 25, 2009 @10:54AM (#449174)

Pleasanton, like Oakland, is in Alameda County, and the two are connected by the BART Dublin/Pleasanton Line.

Santa Clara County is car country.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Ask HN: Good Hacker Cities by revelude on Sunday January 25, 2009 @02:45AM (#448891)

The right job.

[ Parent | on HN ]