Re:Chinese company uses leaked photos to copy, patent iPhone...
by zerostar07 on Friday September 07, 2012 @06:21AM
(#4488407)
The fact that Dieter Rams is flattered doesnt make it a false comparison, au contraire, it means he sees obvious "influence". Also how can daringfireball's opinion be considered an unbiased source.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Chinese company uses leaked photos to copy, patent iPhone...
by digitalengineer on Friday September 07, 2012 @07:24AM
(#4488540)
I suggest you read the Daring Fireball article, which states:
"This is the subjective line between homage and rip-off. The old joke is that homage is when you copy someone else; a rip-off is when someone else copies you. But to me, it’s about the difference between drawing inspiration to create something new, versus slavishly copying to create something derivative. That’s the difference between great artists stealing and bad artists copying.
Apple’s products are in different categories than the corresponding Braun devices, and are separated by decades. But there’s no denying the inspiration. Jony Ive himself has readily acknowledged the influence."
Re:Chinese company uses leaked photos to copy, patent iPhone...
by peanutz on Friday September 07, 2012 @07:17AM
(#4488527)
All this proves is Dieter Rams is a good guy. Apple on the other hand learned to copy but not to play nice.
Re:Chinese company uses leaked photos to copy, patent iPhone...
by enraged_camel on Friday September 07, 2012 @11:23AM
(#4489548)
Influence is not the same thing as imitation.
Re:Chinese company uses leaked photos to copy, patent iPhone...
by zerostar07 on Friday September 07, 2012 @12:23PM
(#4489855)
These lines are for courts to decide (I didn't know the braun radios myself, but the iPad and the iPhone calculator seem pretty much imitations)
In the end, depending on the financial damage at stake, some people will sue, while others may be flattered.