Re:Stanford to continue legacy admissions and withdraw from ...
by nradov on Saturday August 09, 2025 @10:31PM
(#44852325)
The last thing we need is to waste more tax money hiring an army of useless bureaucrats to micromanage corporate hiring practices. Inequality and privilege are preferable to that kind of dystopia. I've always found it bizarre how so many "progressives" think it's acceptable to use force to realize their preferred society.
Re:Stanford to continue legacy admissions and withdraw from ...
by otterley on Sunday August 10, 2025 @03:16AM
(#44853382)
> The last thing we need is to waste more tax money hiring an army of useless bureaucrats to micromanage corporate hiring practices.
Does that include preventing discrimination based on race, religion, ethnic origin, gender, and age?
Re:Stanford to continue legacy admissions and withdraw from ...
by sapphicsnail on Sunday August 10, 2025 @03:51AM
(#44853551)
Conservatives are literally using force to realize their preferred society. What world do you live in?
Re:Stanford to continue legacy admissions and withdraw from ...
by sokoloff on Sunday August 10, 2025 @04:56AM
(#44853824)
And itβs ridiculous and should be repudiated, not copied and expanded in a different direction.
Re:Stanford to continue legacy admissions and withdraw from ...
by BrenBarn on Sunday August 10, 2025 @05:36PM
(#44858523)
> I've always found it bizarre how so many "progressives" think it's acceptable to use force to realize their preferred society.
All law is the use of force to realize a preferred society.
This is an argument for stricter regulation, not more lenient. It means that schools that give such advantages to the already-privileged should not be able to even exist, nor should businesses that give such advantages in hiring, nor should any entity that gives such advantages. In other words, if this rule didn't succeed at making those people (or rather, their advantages) irrelevant, then we need an even harsher rule.