Re:Mar-a-Lago Face
by pavel_lishin on Saturday August 09, 2025 @06:28PM
(#44850918)
How much have you given in the past?
Re:Mar-a-Lago Face
by moralestapia on Saturday August 09, 2025 @06:38PM
(#44851003)
That doesn't make any difference.
Weird.
Re:Mar-a-Lago Face
by pavel_lishin on Saturday August 09, 2025 @09:49PM
(#44852127)
It does. If you've never donated to Wikipedia, then saying you'll never donate means nothing, as you weren't likely to start anyway. It would have all the weight of a vegan telling us they're going to start boycotting a local steakhouse.
Re:Mar-a-Lago Face
by moralestapia on Sunday August 10, 2025 @12:34AM
(#44852775)
Me donating or not donating does not make Wikipedia more or less political.
It's so dumb that I have to explicitly state this, but apparently is necessary.
Re:Mar-a-Lago Face
by pavel_lishin on Sunday August 10, 2025 @10:34AM
(#44855475)
But it does mean that your previous statement doesn't mean anything.
It's like me pledging to stop donating to the Urbandale High School Band Program. I've never donated before, and I never planned to anyway, so why even make the statement?
Re:Mar-a-Lago Face
by bediger4000 on Saturday August 09, 2025 @08:56PM
(#44851867)
Very strange! This article had the opposite effect on me. I just donated.
Re:Mar-a-Lago Face
by moralestapia on Sunday August 10, 2025 @12:35AM
(#44852780)
Yeah, cool.
Re:Mar-a-Lago Face
by rediscovery on Sunday August 10, 2025 @04:33AM
(#44853732)
The article linked doesn't ridicule anyone.
So now it's suddenly ok to ridicule the appearance of women Weren't they supposed to be their allies? What a bunch of sc*mbags.
Never giving a cent to Wikipedia ever, as it is clear it is now a political platform, away from its intended purpose, and for one very specific country.