Or is it really ChatGPTs 2 cents? Copy-pasting LLM responses is as useful as posting a "let me google that for you" link. It's a lazy response at a minimum.
The anti AI HN comments are the new anti Bitcoin - your replies are much worse than someone sharing the gpt output.
A google link at least allows me to verify sources and use my brain.
It's like having a group conversation in person and one member of the group contributes nothing but things they read off Google.
Should they have searched it and kept the information to themselves? Or should they have done additional research after asking AI(like looking into its sources) and tried confirming it and actually listing us the sources of their discoveries and then disclose that they used AI.
I generally feel like they wanted to share the information but I mean :/ I'd be actually interested as to what you offer him to do actually if he was really curious and did search chatgpt.
I always feel like knowledge should be open and that just saying that knowledge out loud doesn't hurt but I do agree with your point too wholeheartedly so its nuanced imo.
their heart might be in the right place tbh. But that's my 2 cents.