Re:Ozempic Shows Anti-Aging Effects in Trial, Reversing Biol...
by theshackleford on Friday August 08, 2025 @03:32AM
(#44834502)
> Its under documented.
Ahh. "Trust me bro" science! No, no I don't think I will. I think I will trust the actual data.
> People having side effects and injuries from these drugs post-surgery are just told to "deal with it."
Well, generally once something has already occurred, yes, that is the reality. Just like with my damaged spinal cord. I now have to "deal with it" because you can't go backwards. Also "just deal with it" does not imply a lack of documentation that it occurred.
> but it still involves a great deal of risk
Yes, just not the level of risk claimed. In fact, not anywhere close in the modern age.
> especially when we put people fully under.
I've zero doubt. That said, I've had more generals than 99.9% of people ever will and i'm still alive and injury free so yay for modern medical science.
Ahh. "Trust me bro" science! No, no I don't think I will. I think I will trust the actual data.
> People having side effects and injuries from these drugs post-surgery are just told to "deal with it."
Well, generally once something has already occurred, yes, that is the reality. Just like with my damaged spinal cord. I now have to "deal with it" because you can't go backwards. Also "just deal with it" does not imply a lack of documentation that it occurred.
> but it still involves a great deal of risk
Yes, just not the level of risk claimed. In fact, not anywhere close in the modern age.
> especially when we put people fully under.
I've zero doubt. That said, I've had more generals than 99.9% of people ever will and i'm still alive and injury free so yay for modern medical science.