News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Cursor CLI by nlh on Friday August 08, 2025 @01:08AM (#44833635)
What I have found Claude Code is extremely good at is that it makes one change at a time, gives you a chance to read the code its changing, and lets you give feedback in real time and steer it properly. I find the mental load with this method to be MUCH lower than Cursor or any of the other tools which give you two very different options: "Ask" mode which dumps a ton of suggestions on your and then requires semi-manual implementation, or "Agent" mode which dumps a ton of actual changes on you and requires your inspection and feedback and roll-backs, etc.

This may not work for everyone, but as a solo dev who wants to keep a real mental model of my work (and not let it get polluted with AI slop), the Claude Code approach just works really well for me. It's like having a coding partner who can iterate and change direction as you talk, not a junior dev who dumps a pile of code on your plate without discussion.

Re:Cursor CLI by anxman on Friday August 08, 2025 @03:21AM (#44834426)
+1 to this. Cursors Agent feels too difficult to wrangle. CC is easier to monitor.
Re:Cursor CLI by xing7673 on Friday August 08, 2025 @05:29AM (#44835119)
I set rules for cursor that when i need cursor to make changes, it will do it with plan-scheme-execute mode. Everything is clear especially when it prompts questiones for you to make scheme as you wish. Today cursor's gpt-5-fast-high model exploits this working style to its extend. This model gives the most detailed scheme for me to customize and i benefit a lot.