News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:GPT-5 by nicce on Thursday August 07, 2025 @02:31PM (#44828521)
It is not mistake. It is common tactic to make illusion of improvement.
Re:GPT-5 by dvfjsdhgfv on Thursday August 07, 2025 @03:20PM (#44829141)
Would they risk such an obvious blunder and being ridiculed for being "AI-sloppy"? I don't believe it.
Re:GPT-5 by crmi on Thursday August 07, 2025 @04:10PM (#44829742)
Perhaps they're taking a leaf from nvidias book - influencers dunking on their bar charts gives a lot of free press coverage/mindshare
Re:GPT-5 by nicce on Thursday August 07, 2025 @03:34PM (#44829303)
I don’t believe for mistake either. As others have said, these graphs are worth of billions. Everything is calculated. They take the risk that some will notice but most will not. They say that it is mistake for those who notice.
Re:GPT-5 by MrNeon on Thursday August 07, 2025 @03:53PM (#44829536)
I've seen that sentiment on reddit as well and I can't phantom how you think it being on purpose is more likely than a mistake when

1 - The error is so blatantly large

2 - There is a graph without error right next to it

3 - The errors are not there in the system card and the presentation page

Re:GPT-5 by nicce on Thursday August 07, 2025 @07:40PM (#44831751)
Not sure what to think anymore https://www.vibechart.net/