Re:A Candidate Giant Planet Imaged in the Habitable Zone of ...
by reactordev on Thursday August 07, 2025 @07:54AM
(#44823303)
We would need to master gravity as a manipulating force instead of a constant. There’s faster methods of traveling long distances than just pointing your nose at it.
Re:A Candidate Giant Planet Imaged in the Habitable Zone of ...
by pbmonster on Thursday August 07, 2025 @09:52AM
(#44824472)
> There’s faster methods of traveling long distances than just pointing your nose at it.
Maybe there is. More likely, there isn't.
Re:A Candidate Giant Planet Imaged in the Habitable Zone of ...
by defyonce on Thursday August 07, 2025 @10:58AM
(#44825352)
Unless we learn how to live for billions of years.
Re:A Candidate Giant Planet Imaged in the Habitable Zone of ...
by vikingerik on Thursday August 07, 2025 @11:32AM
(#44825811)
Note that the "Earth-sized" condition in there is doing some heavy lifting. Earth is a factor of 40x more massive than the largest moon in our solar system. A body needs to be fairly close to Earth's mass to have enough gravity to retain liquid water on its surface. Not that it couldn't happen, but we currently don't have any known precedent for a moon that large.
Re:A Candidate Giant Planet Imaged in the Habitable Zone of ...
by spartanatreyu on Thursday August 07, 2025 @09:29PM
(#44832417)
Why limit ourselves to liquid water on its surface?
It'd be easy to have a world covered in ice with underwater oceans kept liquid by volcanic vents.
Still, getting there with something like David Kipping’s proposed TARS propulsion system (a solar-powered launcher that can fling tiny probes at ~40 km/s) we’d be looking at 30,000+ years to reach the star system. It’s a step forward, but for now, our best hope is to keep watching. Until someone develops fusion propulsion…