"I closed MPEG on 2 Jun '20 when I left because obscure forces had hijacked it."

Re:"I closed MPEG on 2 Jun '20 when I left because obscure f... by egeozcan on Thursday August 07, 2025 @06:33AM (#44822806)

This might be an oversimplification, but as a consumer, I think I see a catch-22 for new codecs. Companies need a big incentive to invest in them, which means the codec has to be technically superior and safe from hidden patent claims. But the only way to know if it's safe is for it to be widely used for a long time. Of course, it can't get widely used without company support in the first place. So, while everyone waits, the technology is no longer superior, and the whole thing fizzles out.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:"I closed MPEG on 2 Jun '20 when I left because obscure f... by jbverschoor on Thursday August 07, 2025 @07:34AM (#44823174)

Jxl has been around for years.

Av1 for 7

The problem is every platform wants to force their own codec, and get earn royalties from the rest of the world.

They literally sabotaging it. Jxl support even got removed from chrome.

Investment in adopting in software is next to 0.

In hardware it’s a different story, and I’m not sure to what extent which codec can be properly accelerated

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:"I closed MPEG on 2 Jun '20 when I left because obscure f... by Taek on Thursday August 07, 2025 @07:31AM (#44823158)

Companies only need a big incentive to invest in new codecs because creating a codec that has a simple incremental improvement would violate existing patents.

[ Parent | on HN ]