News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:We replaced passwords with something worse by apt-apt-apt-apt on Thursday August 07, 2025 @04:22AM (#44821981)
Would it be a viable and simple solution to only enter 6-digit codes into the specific website that requested it?

Isn't this the same thing as BAD asking, let us know the code i.e. password that GOOD gave you? Why would one be inclined to give BAD (i.e. someone else) this info?

Re:We replaced passwords with something worse by FabHK on Thursday August 07, 2025 @04:38AM (#44822086)
If you're phished, you're probably not checking the domain too carefully anyway.

You get an email, providing you with a phishing link for miсrosoft.com (where the apparent c is actually the cyrillic "s", so BAD). In the background, they initiate a login to microsoft.com (GOOD), who then send you a 6 digit code from the actual microsoft.com. If you were fooled by the original phishing website, you have no reason to doubt the code or not enter it.

Re:We replaced passwords with something worse by kylehigginson on Thursday August 07, 2025 @04:29AM (#44822026)
This came to my mind too. But by using a password manager it will be able to differentiate between the GOOD and BAD site. So I think the point is valid only if the user is not using a password manager.
Re:We replaced passwords with something worse by pmontra on Thursday August 07, 2025 @06:21AM (#44822715)
Or copy pasting passwords manually. In that case the password manager is equivalent to a list of passwords on a sheet of paper.