Re:Hacker holds alleged Romney tax returns ransom for $1M in...
by Bakkot on Wednesday September 05, 2012 @11:05PM
(#4482666)
Wouldn't 'laundering' look exactly like 'sending the BTC to any of the dozens of services which store BTC for you in a centralized account, (SR, instawallet, etc) and then withdrawing that same amount? This produces bitcoins not visibly linked to the originals - it's exactly like depositing and then withdrawing money from a bank (a bank which doesn't make a record of people's identity).
Re:Hacker holds alleged Romney tax returns ransom for $1M in...
by politician on Friday September 07, 2012 @10:05AM
(#4489078)
If the authorities observe transactions in the block chain sent to known actors (like a centralized BTC bank), the actor can be subpoenaed, raided, or shutdown.
Re:Hacker holds alleged Romney tax returns ransom for $1M in...
by Bakkot on Monday September 10, 2012 @12:53AM
(#4498369)
You think? I'm pretty sure they already have sufficient motivation to shutdown Silk Road, which for laundering purposes is essentially a bank. By what mechanism do you propose they raid Silk Road's records, assuming such even exist?
I have no doubt that the Secret Service would monitor that account and the transitive closure of the transaction graph involved for the next 50 years if a payment was made to it. Hell, if there is any value currently assigned to that account it is effectively pinned.
The owner of the account would have to work very hard to launder it.