Ozempic Shows Anti-Aging Effects in Trial, Reversing Biological Age by 3.1 Years

Re:Ozempic Shows Anti-Aging Effects in Trial, Reversing Biol... by nomel on Wednesday August 06, 2025 @05:50PM (#44818278)

> Just that demanding every drug be used for 30+ years before you’ll touch it is not actually making an analysis of the tradeoffs involved.

Your replies are unnecessarily aggressive, and you’re not reading comments in a charitable way, or keeping track of the usernames writing them. Nobody is saying this.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Ozempic Shows Anti-Aging Effects in Trial, Reversing Biol... by johncolanduoni on Thursday August 07, 2025 @12:13AM (#44820496)

I also never said we were “immune to unintended consequences”. How charitable was putting those words in my mouth?

Also not sure where your quip about me not keeping track of usernames came from - I responded to specific examples given in each individual comment. They just both happened to bring up benzodiazepines.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Ozempic Shows Anti-Aging Effects in Trial, Reversing Biol... by nomel on Thursday August 07, 2025 @03:47PM (#44829453)

I would strongly suggest re-reading this chain, and your replies, and trying to take what people are saying more charitably.

>> Also not sure where your quip about me not keeping track of usernames came from

You said "neither were you", but that was djtango's first reply to you:

> I wasn’t talking about non-pharmaceuticals, and neither were you

And the most recent example:

> I also never said we were “immune to unintended consequences”. How charitable was putting those words in my mouth?

I didn't do any of that. It's actually completely unrelated to my comment and how you're presenting yourself.

[ Parent | on HN ]