Re:Top 35 Startups In Tech that TechCrunch missed out on – A...
by goldeneye on Wednesday September 05, 2012 @02:40PM
(#4480749)
How come all the startups mentioned here are websites? I have nothing against them, but I would imagine that there are some startups out there that are less of a hit-or-miss and more about the product that has some engineering novelty to it.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Top 35 Startups In Tech that TechCrunch missed out on – A...
by dokem on Wednesday September 05, 2012 @02:47PM
(#4480781)
The term 'startup' has become a buzzword used to define websites providing social or media services. Not that these sites aren't necessarily providing anything of use, but when I hear someone use the term 'startup' I don't know if they're talking about a company or just a product.
Re:Top 35 Startups In Tech that TechCrunch missed out on – A...
by mc_ on Wednesday September 05, 2012 @03:53PM
(#4481129)
2600Hz is building a communications platform and happens to have a website.
Re:Top 35 Startups In Tech that TechCrunch missed out on – A...
by Lost_BiomedE on Wednesday September 05, 2012 @02:53PM
(#4480818)
This is why I like browsing the diversity of kickstarter.