News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ozempic Shows Anti-Aging Effects in Trial, Reversing Biol... by radiofreeeuropa on Tuesday August 05, 2025 @06:11PM (#44805072)
Run a study of your approach and show good results over a cohort for 2+ years and you'll make an entire sub-field of medical scientists very happy.

[EDIT] It's not that your approach can't work, it's that if (for example) people had as hard a time following the directions for condoms as they do following diet & workout plans, we'd never allow condoms to be sold as contraceptives, they'd not even be close to being OK to promote as useful for that purpose. It wouldn't matter if a few people could follow the directions and it worked 100% of the time for them.

Re:Ozempic Shows Anti-Aging Effects in Trial, Reversing Biol... by throwawaylaptop on Tuesday August 05, 2025 @06:28PM (#44805246)
I assure you, not buying bread and pastries for your family is a lot easier than correctly using a condom in the heat of the moment. Which is why most people don't use them and use pull out instead. Because even that is easier and better if done right. (I know when to pullout, I don't know if a condom broke before it's too late).

Anyway, it does work, people just aren't told to do it firmly. Doctors dance around it.

Re:Ozempic Shows Anti-Aging Effects in Trial, Reversing Biol... by op00to on Tuesday August 05, 2025 @07:07PM (#44805635)
You’re a fool. “Pull out” does not protect against pregnancy or STDs. Pre-ejaculate can have viable sperm in it.
Re:Ozempic Shows Anti-Aging Effects in Trial, Reversing Biol... by throwawaylaptop on Tuesday August 05, 2025 @08:19PM (#44806172)
It only has sperm if you have a medical problem.

I have been using pullout method for 25 years, very consistently with basically 50 women at this point, and not one pregnancy scare (other than one girl trying to pass off her pregnancy as mine once). Same for many of my friends.

Re:Ozempic Shows Anti-Aging Effects in Trial, Reversing Biol... by bluGill on Wednesday August 06, 2025 @02:32AM (#44808442)
You reduce the odds. It is good for those who want kids but not 20 - which is likely the result with nothing at all.

does nothing about stds though.

Re:Ozempic Shows Anti-Aging Effects in Trial, Reversing Biol... by backscratches on Wednesday August 06, 2025 @05:50AM (#44809934)
pre ejaculate contains zero sperm if you havent fully ejaculated previously. there is no mechanism for sperm to be released during preejaculation.
Re:Ozempic Shows Anti-Aging Effects in Trial, Reversing Biol... by komali2 on Wednesday August 06, 2025 @07:03AM (#44810431)
Pull out method is a less viable method of preventing pregnancy, and especially less viable at preventing STDs. However, it's still considered a contraceptive strategy.

https://www.plannedparenthood.org/learn/birth-control/withdr...

For every 100 people who use pull out method perfectly, within a year, 4 will get pregnant. Since not everyone does a great job doing it, in reality 22 get pregnant every year.

Here's a great overview page: https://www.plannedparenthood.org/learn/birth-control in summary, condoms are 87% effective at preventing pregnancy, and withdrawal is 78% effective.

For a going-steady couple that isn't worried about STDs, keeps an emergency contraceptive ('morning after pill') ready for oopsie mistakes, and live in a country that grants women bodily autonomy (or have discussed and accepted that a mistake might lead to a child), pullout is a perfectly valid contraceptive mechanism. There are better, but considering that basically every method except a condom/internal condom can cause extreme discomfort or bad side effects to the woman in the relationship, I think it's totally fine to choose pull-out.

Re:Ozempic Shows Anti-Aging Effects in Trial, Reversing Biol... by liveoneggs on Wednesday August 06, 2025 @09:09AM (#44811477)
87% of people in this study reversed t2d or prediabetes with diet and exercise: https://bmcmedicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s1291...
Re:Ozempic Shows Anti-Aging Effects in Trial, Reversing Biol... by radiofreeeuropa on Wednesday August 06, 2025 @10:48AM (#44812768)
... and drugs.

And they had 86% adherence for a year. If they'd studied this farther out and it went the same way as basically any study that's done that, adherence would be a lot worse in another couple years. And that's in a group that's exceptionally motivated vs. the general population—has an actual illness they're trying to treat, and has opted in to the study knowing what it's asking of them and for how long.