Typed languages are better suited for vibecoding

Re:Typed languages are better suited for vibecoding by Fire-Dragon-DoL on Monday August 04, 2025 @03:37AM (#44782988)

I work in both ruby and go. There is no comparison ai is way better with ruby (rails).

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Typed languages are better suited for vibecoding by paffdragon on Monday August 04, 2025 @04:18AM (#44783206)

Is that specific to using Rails or it is good with plain Ruby as well?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Typed languages are better suited for vibecoding by Fire-Dragon-DoL on Monday August 04, 2025 @04:24AM (#44783239)

Rails, I haven't tried at all with plain ruby, but I doubt. I think formulaic = static typing for AI

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Typed languages are better suited for vibecoding by sharperguy on Monday August 04, 2025 @05:31AM (#44783591)

Hmm I can imagine that while LLMs are good at producing working code in Go they might not be as good at structuring larger applications, compared to building on opinionated frameworks.

I imagine there could be some presets out there that guide the vibe-coding engines to produce a particular structure in other languages for better results.

[ Parent | on HN ]