Re:Names are not type safety (2020)
by b_e_n_t_o_n on Sunday August 03, 2025 @10:48PM
(#44781692)
You mean like if you have two types which are identical but you want your type system to treat them as distinct? To me that's a data modelling issue rather than something wrong with the type system, but I understand how it can sometimes be unavoidable and you need to work around it.
I think it also makes more sense in immutable functional languages like clojure. Oddly enough I like it in Go too, despite being very different from clojure.
I think it also makes more sense in immutable functional languages like clojure. Oddly enough I like it in Go too, despite being very different from clojure.