News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Tomorrow Theme by akkartik on Wednesday September 05, 2012 @01:37AM (#4478154)
I'm not sure how to do all of that, but the bit about reducing the dynamic range resonates. I think syntax highlighting should exist to highlight three categories of syntax:

a) comments. What is never run?

b) literals. What is just plain data?

c) punctuation -- mostly so it can be deemphasized.

Sample of my minimalist 'scheme': http://imgur.com/NrrS9.png

Re:Tomorrow Theme by mhd on Wednesday September 05, 2012 @03:01AM (#4478310)
Which brings us almost full-circle to early monochromatic highlighting, where you didn't have many options besides adding bold and italic to the mix.
Re:Tomorrow Theme by danbee on Wednesday September 05, 2012 @04:09AM (#4478434)
Your scheme reminds me of CGA colour palettes. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Color_Graphics_Adapter
Re:Tomorrow Theme by daralthus on Wednesday September 05, 2012 @02:02AM (#4478201)
I think different colors/shades for different types and highlighting profiling data for functions could be useful also.
Re:Tomorrow Theme by akkartik on Wednesday September 05, 2012 @02:06AM (#4478211)
Funny you should mention profiling; I was just reading http://blog.golang.org/2011/06/profiling-go-programs.html today. The Go profiler seems extremely impressive.