UN report finds UN reports are not widely read

Re:UN report finds UN reports are not widely read by Pinus on Sunday August 03, 2025 @01:49PM (#44778291)

Not quite the level of the 2012 IgNobel litterature price, which went to "The US Government General Accountability Office, for issuing a report about reports about reports that recommends the preparation of a report about the report about reports about reports."

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:UN report finds UN reports are not widely read by prmph on Sunday August 03, 2025 @02:45PM (#44778708)

Do you have a link to this report?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:UN report finds UN reports are not widely read by cperciva on Sunday August 03, 2025 @03:04PM (#44778843)

https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-12-480r

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:UN report finds UN reports are not widely read by marcosdumay on Sunday August 03, 2025 @03:28PM (#44779020)

And, like most IgNobel winners, it's an important research about important problems.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:UN report finds UN reports are not widely read by classichasclass on Sunday August 03, 2025 @03:20PM (#44778965)

That is absolutely impenetrable prose. An LLM couldn't make it any more obfuscated.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:UN report finds UN reports are not widely read by prmph on Sunday August 03, 2025 @06:24PM (#44780356)

I do not see anywhere in that report evidence of the deep semantic recursion you mentioned

[ Parent | on HN ]