Re:A.I. Researchers Are Negotiating $250M Pay Packages
by UmGuys on Sunday August 03, 2025 @07:33AM
(#44775852)
I don't think so. It's just a bubble. There's no AI, we have fancy chatbots. If someone were to achieve AGI, maybe they win, but it's unlikely to exist. Or if it does, we can't define it.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:A.I. Researchers Are Negotiating $250M Pay Packages
by nopinsight on Sunday August 03, 2025 @07:55AM
(#44775928)
What would you say if the IMO Gold Medal models from DeepMind and OpenAI turn out to be generalizable to other domains including those with hard-to-verify reward signals?
Hint: Researchers from both companies said publicly they employ generalized reasoning techniques in these IMO models.
Re:A.I. Researchers Are Negotiating $250M Pay Packages
by UmGuys on Sunday August 03, 2025 @09:00AM
(#44776275)
Nice. That's really great progress. Maybe a model will be able to infer what consciousness is.
Re:A.I. Researchers Are Negotiating $250M Pay Packages
by cesarb on Sunday August 03, 2025 @11:04AM
(#44777056)
> There's no AI, we have fancy chatbots.
"Fancy chatbots" is a classic AI use case. ELIZA is a well-known example of early AI software.
Re:A.I. Researchers Are Negotiating $250M Pay Packages
by UmGuys on Sunday August 03, 2025 @11:12AM
(#44777116)
I'm not familiar with ELIZA. Technical terms mean things. AI has no technical meaning. It's difficult to distinguish what people mean when they say AI, but as technical people I assume we know AGI doesn't exist yet and we don't know if it ever will.