News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Study finds organic food no more nutritive than non-organic by Turing_Machine on Monday September 03, 2012 @09:22PM (#4472618)
"they don't inherently carry any more diseases than you or I."

I don't eat crops fertilized with human feces, either.

"That we shouldn't use natural sources of NPK? Try your hand at explaining that."

I don't like famines that kill millions of people.

Re:Study finds organic food no more nutritive than non-organic by encoderer on Monday September 03, 2012 @09:56PM (#4472704)
Do you think there's no natural manure fertilizer on your crops? You've got an interesting argument here. You're against organic food because it's more likely to spread bacteria and parasites? But you've not really offered any facts, just blanket statements. I'm going to bow-out of this now -- apologize if I'm reading this wrong but this all seems too trollish for my tastes.
Re:Study finds organic food no more nutritive than non-organic by Turing_Machine on Monday September 03, 2012 @10:15PM (#4472740)
I've provided links for everything. You've provided none.

A couple more:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_famines

Note how few of these occurred in countries with industrialized agriculture (the exceptions being cause by war devastation or the like).

https://www.google.com/search?q=percentage+of+population+in+...

Numerous sources demonstrating that pre-industrial farming resulted in 90-odd percent of the population being peasants.

Re:Study finds organic food no more nutritive than non-organic by Turing_Machine on Monday September 03, 2012 @09:33PM (#4472654)
I also don't think I'd care to live in a world where 90+% of us were illiterate peasants bound to the soil (serfs if we were lucky, slaves if not), spending our entire lives on hand-cultivation of crops.

That was the norm essentially everywhere on the planet right up until the development of modern, mechanized agriculture.