Re:AMD CEO Sees Chips from TSMC's US Plant Costing 5%-20% More
by almosthere on Friday July 25, 2025 @10:07AM
(#44683295)
Yeah I think everyone understood that analogy you spelled out w/respect to MAD.
Re:AMD CEO Sees Chips from TSMC's US Plant Costing 5%-20% More
by criley2 on Saturday July 26, 2025 @10:30AM
(#44694397)
China would not engage in nuclear escalation in response to the US striking Taiwan, and China does not otherwise possess the ability to strike the US homeland without incurring a nuclear response, so there is no mutually assured destruction with regards to semiconductor industry. In this hypothetical, the US would succeed in striking Taiwan and China would not escalate into nuclear war. But, the US would not strike Taiwan. Taiwan would destroy their own industry before that happened.
And mututally assured destruction has nothing to do with the US destroying an industry in Taiwan. MAD specifically refers to the idea that superpowers cannot engage in nuclear war against one another without also being destroyed themselves, because of a Nuclear Triad.
For "Mutually Assured Destruction" to be in anyway applicable, you'd have to say that the second that the US destroyed "Chinese" fabs (Taiwan), China would destroy American fabs. Thus, the US would not attack China without risking itself. The US making targeted strikes on Taiwan is one sided destruction. But to be clear: MAD doctrine is specifically about fullscale thermonuclear war.