Re:Executive Order – Preventing Woke AI in the Federal Gover...
by RS-232 on Wednesday July 23, 2025 @07:56PM
(#44665377)
woke = anti-traditional
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Executive Order – Preventing Woke AI in the Federal Gover...
by sgnelson on Wednesday July 23, 2025 @09:14PM
(#44665824)
woke = "something I don't like."
Re:Executive Order – Preventing Woke AI in the Federal Gover...
by dzhiurgis on Thursday July 24, 2025 @12:06AM
(#44666811)
Same like nazi
Re:Executive Order – Preventing Woke AI in the Federal Gover...
by chownie on Thursday July 24, 2025 @04:45AM
(#44668486)
Nah, there's at least a comparison to be made with a concrete actual thing (the nazi party) -- "woke" in 99.9% of its current usage has no meaning whatsoever beyond a nebulous "this is what they think" type connotation.
A nazi person is a supremacist. A woke person... Is what? There's no consistency about what that is at all. I've seen the word woke applied to vegetarian pizza toppings. It literally has no meaning beyond being a snarl word.
Re:Executive Order – Preventing Woke AI in the Federal Gover...
by dzhiurgis on Thursday July 24, 2025 @08:28PM
(#44678020)
Wokeness is obviously supremacy - moral purity and superiority.
Re:Executive Order – Preventing Woke AI in the Federal Gover...
by chownie on Friday July 25, 2025 @11:05AM
(#44683981)
So obvious yet no one else has claimed the same definition.
Re:Executive Order – Preventing Woke AI in the Federal Gover...
by Smeevy on Wednesday July 23, 2025 @10:01PM
(#44666081)
Reasonable, but I think we could back into a more exact definition by determining what "woke" does not encompass.
For the modern conservative, it appears that sex trafficking and pedophilia are now acceptable and are thus not "woke."