Re:Why Elixir? A Rebuttal to Common Misconceptions
by arrowsmith on Wednesday July 23, 2025 @02:42PM
(#44662552)
Imo this complaint is really overrated: https://arrowsmithlabs.com/blog/you-might-not-need-gradual-t...
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Why Elixir? A Rebuttal to Common Misconceptions
by Jonovono on Wednesday July 23, 2025 @06:11PM
(#44664574)
> But honestly, I’ve always felt like this objection was overblown. I’ve got nothing against static typing; some of my best friends use statically-typed programming languages.
lol
Re:Why Elixir? A Rebuttal to Common Misconceptions
by vwwvwwv on Wednesday July 23, 2025 @08:52PM
(#44665691)
I liked the article, but I found it a bit strange that it presented pure functions as a feature of Elixir rather than as a general good practice. Surely there's nothing particularly unique about Elixir in this regard compared to other languages?
Re:Why Elixir? A Rebuttal to Common Misconceptions
by spooky_deep on Thursday July 24, 2025 @04:44AM
(#44668479)
There are auxiliary language features such as pattern matching that make pure functions viable at scale.