News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Science confirms what we all suspected: Four-day weeks rule by ericmcer on Tuesday July 22, 2025 @05:30PM (#44653223)
Seriously my job is relatively relaxed, but I am still losing my mind because it is just an endless stretch of 5 day weeks for... 20 years? The only version of reality where I could accept that is if I had kids and family all dependent on my work, but without that I am unsure how people aren't filled with ennui when they look into that future.
Re:Science confirms what we all suspected: Four-day weeks rule by vouaobrasil on Tuesday July 22, 2025 @05:56PM (#44653463)
Well, I think that's part of the lock-in. Not kids exactly, but the fact that society has made raising kids over time a hugely expensive activity (whereas once it was not in much earlier times). Because in modern society, having a family means paying for services to keep them functioning (extracurricular activities, romantic vacations for the parents, daycare), and that was encouraged by the system not because it makes us the most happy, but because it is the most efficient for technological innovation.
Re:Science confirms what we all suspected: Four-day weeks rule by Qem on Tuesday July 22, 2025 @06:22PM (#44653667)
> because it is the most efficient for technological innovation

Probably more efficient for rentism. See https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rent-seeking

It destroys the very conditions for the next generation of scientists being raised.

Re:Science confirms what we all suspected: Four-day weeks rule by vouaobrasil on Wednesday July 23, 2025 @04:26AM (#44656923)
One does not necessarily need a healthy environment for the next generation of scientists if there is already a surplus of them willing to work in rather sordid conditions, and if there is a surplus of scientific discoveries that can be easily capitalized upon with few workers. Or if there is a surplus of science being done elsehwere. The system optimizes for short-term production and growth, and a good environment for science everyhere is not necessarily optimal for that.
Re:Science confirms what we all suspected: Four-day weeks rule by tayo42 on Tuesday July 22, 2025 @05:40PM (#44653311)
Working from home makes it more bearable. It feels like I use my free time to make money instead of going to work. It's not like I do hobbies 16 hours a day

I wish the job market was better so I could find a more engaging job.

Re:Science confirms what we all suspected: Four-day weeks rule by vouaobrasil on Tuesday July 22, 2025 @06:02PM (#44653510)
Yeah, it's tough to find an engaging job that provides a balance because of the insane competition that will only get worse due to the increase in efficiency with AI. Efficiency up to a point implies comfort, and beyond that point implies wage-slavery.
Re:Science confirms what we all suspected: Four-day weeks rule by Yeul on Wednesday July 23, 2025 @05:45AM (#44657370)
That's another thing about America. People work too far from their job so you are adding a long commute to your daily grind.
Re:Science confirms what we all suspected: Four-day weeks rule by cedws on Wednesday July 23, 2025 @08:01AM (#44658241)
Kids play a part in trapping you in that lifestyle though. If you’re fortunate enough to have a job where you can save money, as long as you don’t have kids you still have the option of just packing your bags and pissing off somewhere for a while.

Lifestyle creep is another way people get trapped in the rat race. Buying silly stuff like expensive cars on finance to show off.

Re:Science confirms what we all suspected: Four-day weeks rule by vouaobrasil on Wednesday July 23, 2025 @12:12PM (#44660834)
That is true, I agree for sure. One of many reasons why I never want them....