News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Economist: Would the world be better off with fewer patents?. Parent comment

Re:Economist: Would the world be better off with fewer patents? by rayiner on Saturday September 01, 2012 @01:38AM (#4462760)
Why?

I don't think the only, or even primary, value of patents is to encourage invention. I think they're valuable for allowing a separation of concerns between inventors and implementors. When you think of patents in that way, it makes total sense for them to be treated as transferable assets.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Economist: Would the world be better off with fewer patents? by ktizo on Saturday September 01, 2012 @01:49AM (#4462776)
..."I don't think the only, or even primary, value of patents is to encourage invention."...

I think it might be -

"To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries."

Nothing there about it being a transferable asset to be treated as property. Is an exclusive right for a limited time for authors and inventors.

[edit] Otherwise it would presumably read: "by securing for limited Times to Companies and Investors the exclusive Right to the respective Writings and Discoveries of Authors and Inventors." Which doesn't scan nearly as well.

[ Parent | on HN ]