News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Jonah Lehrer’s Journalistic Misdeeds at Wired.com by Alex3917 on Friday August 31, 2012 @09:58PM (#4462434)
I've mentioned this here before, but similarly I caught Chris Hedges plagiarizing in one of his articles, in a very similar situation where he had blatantly copied someone else's mistakes. But when I emailed his editors to tell them about it, they basically told me to go fuck myself. I'm pretty sure that most journalistic organizations these days know what's going on and just don't want any of it to come to light unless some other organization forces the issue, in which case they then do everything they can to throw the person under the bus.
Re:Jonah Lehrer’s Journalistic Misdeeds at Wired.com by smhinsey on Friday August 31, 2012 @11:21PM (#4462563)
I think part of this is also that no one really wants to admit that a lot of content that goes out under a given columnist's name is not actually written by them. The byline is more about branding than authorship these days.
Re:Jonah Lehrer’s Journalistic Misdeeds at Wired.com by Alex3917 on Friday August 31, 2012 @11:40PM (#4462592)
That's definitely true for newspaper editorials and for columnists, but not usually for regular articles and blog posts.
Re:Jonah Lehrer’s Journalistic Misdeeds at Wired.com by supporting on Friday August 31, 2012 @11:01PM (#4462536)
Mind sharing the articles that you found?
Re:Jonah Lehrer’s Journalistic Misdeeds at Wired.com by Alex3917 on Friday August 31, 2012 @11:20PM (#4462561)
This paragraph:

"There are over 42 million American adults, 20 percent of whom hold high school diplomas, who cannot read, as well as the 50 million who read at a fourth- or fifth-grade level. Nearly a third of the nation’s population is illiterate or barely literate. And their numbers are growing by an estimated 2 million a year. But even those who are supposedly literate retreat in huge numbers into this image-based existence. A third of high school graduates, along with 42 percent of college graduates, never read a book after they finish school. Eighty percent of the families in the United States last year did not buy a book."

From this article:

http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/20081110_america_the_ill...

The first half I believe comes from John Taylor Gatto's analysis of the 1993 National Adult Literacy Survey:

http://www.johntaylorgatto.com/chapters/3j.htm

Which he shouldn't have been using in 2008, because the 2003 data had already been released well before at that point. The primary source is here:

http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=93275

The next two statistics seem to originate from this article:

http://parapublishing.com/sites/para/resources/statistics.cf...

However, if you read it you'll notice that A) Almost none of the claims are sourced and B) many of them contradict each other C) They completely contradict the data from the government's survey on citizen's participation in literature and the arts: http://www.nea.gov/pub/readingatrisk.pdf.

Thus, leading me to believe that most of the 'statistics' are in fact entirely apocryphal to begin with.