Re:Nobody Knows How to Build with AI Yet
by lordnacho on Saturday July 19, 2025 @01:24PM
(#44617410)
The way I ended up paying for Claude max was that I started on the cheap plan, it went well, then it wanted more money, and I paid because things were going well.
Then it ran out of money again, and I gave it even more money.
I'm in the low 4 figures a year now, and it's worth it. For a day's pay each year, I've got a junior dev who is super fast, makes good suggestions, and makes working code.
Re:Nobody Knows How to Build with AI Yet
by Avicebron on Saturday July 19, 2025 @01:52PM
(#44617689)
> For a day's pay each year
For anyone trying to back of the napkin at $1000 as 4-figures per year, averaged as a day salary, the baseline salary where this makes sense is about ~$260,000/yr? Is that about right lordnacho?
Re:Nobody Knows How to Build with AI Yet
by lordnacho on Saturday July 19, 2025 @02:23PM
(#44618010)
Yeah I thought that was a reasonable number in the ballpark. I mean, it probably makes sense to pay a lot more for it. A grand is probably well within the range where you shouldn't care about it, even if you only get a basic salary and it's a terrible year with no bonus.
And that's not saying AI tools are the real deal, either. It can be a lot less than a fully self driving dev and still be worth a significant fraction of an entry level dev.
Re:Nobody Knows How to Build with AI Yet
by antihipocrat on Saturday July 19, 2025 @02:45PM
(#44618201)
I assume it's after tax too..
you: HAVE YOU PUT MORE TOKENS IN???? ARE YOU PUTTING THEM IN THE EXPENSIVE MACHINES???
super compelling argument /s
if you want to provide working examples of "prompt engineering" or "context engineering" please do but "just keep paying until the behavior is impressive" isn't winning me as a customer
it's like putting out a demo program that absolutely sucks and promising that if I pay, it'll get good. why put out the shit demo and give me this impression, then, if it sucks?