Re:Valve confirms credit card companies pressured it to deli...
by aleph_minus_one on Saturday July 19, 2025 @04:59AM
(#44613790)
> But even in the case of Steam, there just isn't a constituency for being pro-incest. This is the last political fight you'd want to get into.
Of course the constituency that is openly pro-incest is small. On the other hand, I believe the constituency for a quite encompassing freedom of speech has to be taken seriously.
Re:Valve confirms credit card companies pressured it to deli...
by mango7283 on Saturday July 19, 2025 @08:06AM
(#44614822)
I think the matter here is the activists are being strategic now and chipping away by targeting very specific content to get delisted. As you rightly said, most people are not going to sign their name to defend a incest/non-con fringe game specifically, so the counter petition is necessarily going to be on a broad ideal and therefore diffuse
Re:Valve confirms credit card companies pressured it to deli...
by LorenPechtel on Saturday July 19, 2025 @03:19PM
(#44618465)
Yeah. I find sex games have basically zero appeal to me, period. But either show me the victim or leave them legal.
Re:Valve confirms credit card companies pressured it to deli...
by rockskon on Sunday July 20, 2025 @01:30AM
(#44622244)
?
Claiming you need to be pro-incest to support the existance of incest themed video games is as absurd as claiming you need to be pro-murder to support much of the entire Action movie genre.
Well, this coverage identifies two restrictions that Valve is enforcing:
(1) No video footage of humans. Animation only.
(2) No incest.
Onlyfans clearly hasn't implemented restriction (1).
If they've implemented (2), that seems like much less of a problem as applied to onlyfans than to animated content on Steam. But even in the case of Steam, there just isn't a constituency for being pro-incest. This is the last political fight you'd want to get into.