Re:Valve confirms credit card companies pressured it to deli...
by maxbond on Friday July 18, 2025 @09:35PM
(#44611744)
I think that for better or worse Valve is genuinely committed to lassies faire moderation, they have historically been very hesitant to remove really heinous games. I don't think they're using this as cover.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Valve confirms credit card companies pressured it to deli...
by Dracophoenix on Friday July 18, 2025 @11:48PM
(#44612428)
That changed with Hatred in 2015. There have been a number of them since. It seems that anything that gives Valve bad press is on its shit list, even if the premise theme has been done before by a bigger or more well-known company stateside. If the upcoming Grand Theft Auto game has full frontal nudity and realistically depicted sex scenes, I doubt Valve would give it a second look.
Re:Valve confirms credit card companies pressured it to deli...
by maxbond on Saturday July 19, 2025 @12:28AM
(#44612599)
That was ten years ago, there have been tons of really objectionable games on Steam in recent years. Eg I just checked and the game where you roleplay as Kyle Rittenhouse shooting protestors is still on Steam.
Per Wikipedia:
> [Hatred] was shortly removed by Valve from their Steam Greenlight service due to its extremely violent content but was later brought back with a personal apology from [Valve's co-founder] Gabe Newell.
Re:Valve confirms credit card companies pressured it to deli...
by Dracophoenix on Saturday July 19, 2025 @08:13PM
(#44620698)
The fact that it was removed at all was a sea-change from Valve's previous stance. Temporary or not, it set a precedent for other removals. For example, Valve had unceremoniously prevented the publication of Super Seducer 3 and retroactively de-published its prequels as a result of a campaign launched by a group of British feminists. (https://happymag.tv/super-seducer-3-steam/)