Re:Linux and Secure Boot certificate expiration
by danudey on Friday July 18, 2025 @12:18PM
(#44606483)
The problem here isn't that Microsoft is the one signing the shim, but that we can't trust systems manufacturers to update their systems, or even to have systems that can be correctly updated.
A public signing institution (or at least, a not-for-profit one) would be a great idea, but it wouldn't solve the core issue that we're worried about.
and secure boot is still the antichrist, but we have to live with them.