News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:ChatGPT agent: bridging research and action by amccollum on Thursday July 17, 2025 @05:03PM (#44598192)
People were saying we would all be getting in our cars and taking a nap on our morning commute. We are clearly still a pretty long ways off from self-driving being as ubiquitous as it was claimed it would be.
Re:ChatGPT agent: bridging research and action by n2d4 on Thursday July 17, 2025 @09:14PM (#44600170)
There are always extremists with absurd timelines on any topic! (Didn't people think we'd be on Mars in 2020?) But this one? In the right cities, plenty of people take a Waymo morning commute every day. I'd say self-driving cars have been pretty successful at meeting people's expectations — or maybe you and I are thinking of different people.
Re:ChatGPT agent: bridging research and action by wat10000 on Friday July 18, 2025 @10:10AM (#44604835)
The expectation of a "self-driving car" is that you can get in it and take any trip that a human driver could take. The "in certain cities" is a huge caveat. If we accept that sort of geographical limitation, why not say that self-driving "cars" have been a thing since driverless metro systems started showing up in the 1980s?
Re:ChatGPT agent: bridging research and action by vidarh on Friday July 18, 2025 @02:26AM (#44601782)
And other people were a lot more moderate but still assumed we'd get self-driving soon, with caveats, and were bang on the money.

So it's not as ubiquitous as the most optimistic estimates suggested. We're still at a stage where the tech is sufficiently advanced that seeing them replace a large proportion of human taxi services now seems likely to have been reduced to a scaling / rollout problem rather than primarily a technology problem, and that's a gigantic leap.

Re:ChatGPT agent: bridging research and action by kjkjadksj on Saturday July 19, 2025 @01:53PM (#44617705)
People were doing that in their tesla years ago and making the news for sleeping on the 5