Thanks for letting me know about your level of comprehension about my comment. It would help if you can give some valid reasons instead of such vague description about the logic in my comment. Kindly use the '>' symbol to reply to specific points you disagree with.

I simply say that:

1) Apple has sued numerous competitors and has won many cases using trivial patents.

2) Numerous competitors have sued Apple for valid, non-BS patents in return and Apple has been found not to infringe a Single patent by ANY of its competitors.

3)In the latest Samsung vs Apple case, numerous inconsistencies were noted by many notable sources (including Groklaw)

And then, I simply say conclude that:

1) Something is wrong with this system; Which may have/most likely involved illegal money (This speculation is because of the reasons above)

2) All these legal systems and patents are hindering innovation. (And I include a personal story of mine, as a member of the start-up community and how it affects us in general)

If you still have a hard time understanding, please let me know. We will have a cup of tea together.