Re:Apple versus Samsung: Jury foreman justifies $1bn verdict
by rustynails77 on Friday August 31, 2012 @05:46AM
(#4458979)
The problem is that when Samsung customise Android, they do so to (a) differentiate, and (b) to ensure you can't upgrade.
On a more "on topic" note, this juror is a turkey. As another poster pretty much said "prior art can not be ignored".
Re:Apple versus Samsung: Jury foreman justifies $1bn verdict
by fpgeek on Friday August 31, 2012 @06:04AM
(#4459017)
Here's another gem:
"Just to make it clear, the phone that I have is a Motorola Droid X2 and the reason I'm mentioning that is because it is in the record, it was told to the judge and told to the court when asked that question.
And it is of a slider variety so it has a normal keyboard, and for that reason it's not among the 26 accused phones. "
The Droid X2, of course, isn't a slider. The juror probably has a Droid 2.
Re:Apple versus Samsung: Jury foreman justifies $1bn verdict
by regularfry on Friday August 31, 2012 @07:38AM
(#4459203)
Nice. Except they awarded $130e6 in damages for the Epic 4G. A slider.
I like the hardware of the SGII I have, and I would prefer the hardware of the Galaxy Note, or the Galaxy Note II.
But also, remove TouchWiz, and still the Galaxy Note II has some very nice and innovative software allowing for pseudo-windowing on Android, as well as "Pen" aware apps.