News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:What's Happening to Reading? by dontlikeyoueith on Wednesday July 16, 2025 @01:11PM (#44584632)
> Dickens' sentence structure was just as difficult to parse then as it is now

This is nonsense. Dickens was an enormously popular writer with common readers.

Re:What's Happening to Reading? by allturtles on Wednesday July 16, 2025 @01:15PM (#44584678)
How are these statements contradictory?
Re:What's Happening to Reading? by easterncalculus on Wednesday July 16, 2025 @01:25PM (#44584772)
They aren't. A run-on, 70 word sentence for example wasn't easier to store in your head, or not require the occasional second read-through back then . Readers then still had to go through all of that. This "it's just outdated" idea is employed primarily to hand-wave poor literacy performance and reading requirements.

Gravity's Rainbow came out in 1973 and has a lot of the same difficulty, but people don't call it 'outdated' or treat it like a foreign language. These are just books you have to read slower than a news article, and that's alright, but there's a fine line between needing more time and not being able to get through it. That study showed it conclusively.

Re:What's Happening to Reading? by dontlikeyoueith on Tuesday July 22, 2025 @02:33PM (#44651217)
Because readers at the time didn't struggle with it as they do now.
Re:What's Happening to Reading? by easterncalculus on Wednesday July 16, 2025 @01:15PM (#44584674)
Yes, he was popular, and his works still weren't as easy to read as some of his contemporaries and many authors before and after him. That's not nonsense, that's reality.