Re:Mira Murati's AI startup Thinking Machines raises $2B in ...
by torginus on Wednesday July 16, 2025 @04:12AM
(#44579866)
The weird thing about Theranos is that every single expert who knew about the technical details of blood testing basically called out the BS from the get go.
Blood testing for a single condition can involve blood separation via centrifuges, application of various chemical solutions, a multi-step process using varios test strips (each with different specificities/sensitivities). Not to mention some of the offending markers might be so rare in blood that you'd have to draw multiple vials just to get a statistically significant amount of markers.
Reducing just a single one of these tests to an instant test that works with a drop of blood would be a major breakthrough, subject to various medical awards (and lengthy medical trials).
Re:Mira Murati's AI startup Thinking Machines raises $2B in ...
by never_inline on Wednesday July 16, 2025 @01:06PM
(#44584562)
Well, in this case, no one knows the technical details.
Re:Mira Murati's AI startup Thinking Machines raises $2B in ...
by bobcostas55 on Wednesday July 16, 2025 @03:48AM
(#44579734)
Theranos famously didn't manage to raise VC money, the funding all came from people like Rupert Murdoch and the Walton family.
Re:Mira Murati's AI startup Thinking Machines raises $2B in ...
by rchaud on Wednesday July 16, 2025 @10:46AM
(#44582923)
That makes a lot of sense. VCs only make money when companies go public, so a medical device that requires years of regulatory compliance legwork to even be allowed into a lab or pharmacy is an immediate no-go.
While these are not necessarily typical cases, they show that it's absolutely possible to have gigantic valuations raised from industry experts with nothing to show for it, if you're good enough at lying.