Re:Ask HN: Is it time to fork HN into AI/LLM and "Everything...
by parpfish on Tuesday July 15, 2025 @01:13PM
(#44573474)
> Folks really do come to HN to read the articles and then maybe get drawn into a discussion.
based on the number of comments i see that are oblivious to the actual content of the articles, i'm pretty sure the user flow is "Folks come to HN to read headlines and have a conversation, and then maybe get drawn into reading an article"
Re:Ask HN: Is it time to fork HN into AI/LLM and "Everything...
by WarOnPrivacy on Tuesday July 15, 2025 @02:14PM
(#44574201)
Those comments can't reflect people who are drawn in by the article but don't engage. Upvotes hint it is a significant number.
Past that, I don't see non-reading commenters being a dominant presence. Some topics draw a few more than normal but that's the worst of it.
Re:Ask HN: Is it time to fork HN into AI/LLM and "Everything...
by Karrot_Kream on Tuesday July 15, 2025 @02:26PM
(#44574331)
Really? I feel like P(didn't read the article | wrote a comment) to be quite high personally. Any thread with > 100 comments seems to be full of these posters.
I don't disagree with this observation about Reddit. However, I feel HN readers are more topic-oriented. Folks really do come to HN to read the articles and then maybe get drawn into a discussion.
I grant there are some topics here that tend to be more engagement driven but on balance I think the above holds.