News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Burning a Magnesium NeXT Cube (1993) by maxbond on Monday July 14, 2025 @03:49AM (#44557449)
The meandering and hyper detailed style was nostalgic to me. Maybe I'm misremembering but I feel like this style was a lot more common 15+ years ago. I wouldn't dream of including this much detail now, and I don't think my writing would be well received if I did. But there's a lot of character in it. It also had more and different typos than I'm used to reading now, typos on the Internet now are mostly the wrong correctly spelled word.
Re:Burning a Magnesium NeXT Cube (1993) by valleyer on Monday July 14, 2025 @05:09AM (#44557885)
Comma splices have also become more common.
Re:Burning a Magnesium NeXT Cube (1993) by maxbond on Monday July 14, 2025 @07:25AM (#44558846)
I had not noticed that, I will keep an eye out.
Re:Burning a Magnesium NeXT Cube (1993) by relaxing on Monday July 14, 2025 @06:27AM (#44558371)
I grew up reading this style of USENET news, BBS post, etc. I’ve never had the capacity to write at length in this manner (lack of patience? self-defeating inner critic?) but I agree, it is still enjoyable to read. And it instantly calls to mind the early internet and the Bay area.
Re:Burning a Magnesium NeXT Cube (1993) by norrisiv on Monday July 14, 2025 @11:51AM (#44561608)
You might be interested in checking out "Up in the Old Hotel". It's a collection of Joseph Mitchell's reportage for The New Yorker from the 30s on – people certainly don't write like they used to!