Re:Investors bought 27% of US homes in Q1, as traditional bu...
by mr_toad on Sunday July 13, 2025 @08:39PM
(#44555227)
The rapidly expanding supply of electronics and computing equipment drove prices down. Housing supply has not kept up with demand. It’s Econ 101.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Investors bought 27% of US homes in Q1, as traditional bu...
by MBCook on Sunday July 13, 2025 @11:06PM
(#44556058)
Furthermore usable land, let alone desirable, is a far more limited resource than silicon chips.
Re:Investors bought 27% of US homes in Q1, as traditional bu...
by appreciatorBus on Monday July 14, 2025 @09:38AM
(#44560110)
In every North American city facing rising housing costs, there is a literal ocean of usable, desirable land for housing, already serviced by municipal infrastructure.
And every month, a percentage of that useable and desirable land comes up for sale, meaning it’s previous owner occupiers are voluntarily moving, and a new owner, if they chose, could redeploy the land in a way that provides homes to many more people, while not evicting anyone.
Unfortunately, each of these cities has also made it illegal for this transition to happen, mandating that the only way you’re allowed to build larger buildings, (if at all) is by demolishing another large (and occupied) building first.
We should change that!