[dead]
^ This is a bot/crackpot account whose only purpose is promoting jumbled words on HN. How/where to report it?
Re:Show HN: Learn LLMs LeetCode Style
by dotancohen on Sunday July 13, 2025 @01:49PM
(#44552117)
Reminds me of some of Xah Lee's earliest posts on the Python mailing lists. Many, myself included, thought he was a clever bot.
Re:Show HN: Learn LLMs LeetCode Style
by anonymoushn on Sunday July 13, 2025 @01:47PM
(#44552098)
Accounts with high karma have a "flag" link in the header of comments and submissions for indicating that it may not be the right kind of content for the site. Human moderators actively monitor the site, so your comment about this user's behavior will be seen by one of them soon.
Re:Show HN: Learn LLMs LeetCode Style
by satvikpendem on Sunday July 13, 2025 @05:51PM
(#44554088)
Email [email protected]
Re:Show HN: Learn LLMs LeetCode Style
by mumbisChungo on Sunday July 13, 2025 @02:41PM
(#44552477)
One time my teacher used a computer to make a math test for me, but then told me I couldn't use my computer during the exam. I dropped out of school immediately.
Re:Show HN: Learn LLMs LeetCode Style
by only-one1701 on Sunday July 13, 2025 @06:54PM
(#44554543)
Great analogy my brother there’s minimal difference between a word processing software and an LLM
Why do you think it I GPT generated?
Re:Show HN: Learn LLMs LeetCode Style
by notathinker on Tuesday July 15, 2025 @02:13PM
(#44574194)
The purpose of the project is learning. The author believes that avoiding GPT will help you learn more effectively and offers that as upfront guidance. In this case, “avoid using GPT” isn’t an ethical directive but simply a learning recommendation. The value of that advice isn’t tied to which tools were used to create the question set.
Re:Show HN: Learn LLMs LeetCode Style
by only-one1701 on Wednesday July 16, 2025 @11:39AM
(#44583503)
Did GPT write this?
I mean...this entire project appears to be mostly GPT-generated?