News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why Lua Beats MicroPython for Serious Embedded Devs by KaiserPro on Sunday July 13, 2025 @10:48AM (#44550823)
With respect that sounds like marketing fluff.

You use micrpython when you have lots of horsepower and need something fairly robust on the network.

You use C/C++ if you need precise control over power, memory or CPU. Even though if you're doing network stuff its much harder to do quickly and securely. (THere might be better embedded TLS support now)

Lua is frankly just sparkling C. Sure if someone has create a bunch of libraries for you, then great, if not, you've now go to support lua toolchain, and your own microcontrollers toolchain, and port what ever control lib the manufacturer provides yourself.

Or, as this is a marketing page, pay https://realtimelogic.com/products/xedge/ to do it for you.

Re:Why Lua Beats MicroPython for Serious Embedded Devs by Archit3ch on Sunday July 13, 2025 @10:55AM (#44550862)
> You use micrpython when you have lots of horsepower

It runs on a 2350.

Re:Why Lua Beats MicroPython for Serious Embedded Devs by blackguardx on Sunday July 13, 2025 @11:47AM (#44551257)
Cortex-M33s are decently powerful in the non-Linux embedded world. Micropython isn't competing with Linux, it is competing with bare-metal code.
Re:Why Lua Beats MicroPython for Serious Embedded Devs by KaiserPro on Sunday July 13, 2025 @11:56AM (#44551313)
the 2350 is huge compared to an STM8, or atmega.
Re:Why Lua Beats MicroPython for Serious Embedded Devs by rasz on Sunday July 13, 2025 @06:43PM (#44554472)
2350 with PSRAM is more powerful than top of the line 1997 PC.