Re:Kimi k2 largest open source SOTA model?
by CaptainFever on Saturday July 12, 2025 @02:59PM
(#44544203)
It's not even open-weight. It's weight-available. It uses a "modified MIT license":
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Kimi k2 largest open source SOTA model?
by mitthrowaway2 on Saturday July 12, 2025 @03:47PM
(#44544587)
This seems significantly more permissive than GPL. I think it's reasonable to consider it open-weight.
Re:Kimi k2 largest open source SOTA model?
by MallocVoidstar on Saturday July 12, 2025 @03:48PM
(#44544597)
4-clause BSD is considered open source by Debian and the FSF and has a similar requirement.
Re:Kimi k2 largest open source SOTA model?
by weitendorf on Saturday July 12, 2025 @10:36PM
(#44547029)
So "MIT with attribution" (but only for huge commercial use cases making tons of money off the product) is not open-weight? Do you consider CC BY photos on Wikipedia to be Image Available or GPL licensed software to be code-available too?
Tangent: I don't understand the contingent that gets upset about open LLMs not shipping with their full training regimes or source data. The software a company spent hundreds of millions of dollars creating, which you are now free to use and distribute with essentially no restrictions, is open source. It has weights in it, and a bunch of related software for actually running a model with those weights. How dare they!