Re:Bad Actors Are Grooming LLMs to Produce Falsehoods
by andrepd on Saturday July 12, 2025 @10:23AM
(#44542293)
As I pointed out in a different comment, the Internet at least was (and is) a promise of many wondrous things: video call your loved ones, talk in message boards, read an encyclopedia, download any book, watch any concert, find any scientific paper, etc etc; even though it has been for the last 15 years cannibalised by the cancerous mix of surveillance capitalism and algorithmic social media.
But LLMs are from the get-go a bad idea, a bullshit generating machine.
Re:Bad Actors Are Grooming LLMs to Produce Falsehoods
by suspended_state on Saturday July 12, 2025 @01:25PM
(#44543502)
> [...] LLMs are from the get-go a bad idea, a bullshit generating machine.
Is that a matter of opinion, or a fact (in which case you should be able to back it up)?
Re:Bad Actors Are Grooming LLMs to Produce Falsehoods
by andrepd on Saturday July 12, 2025 @05:26PM
(#44545321)
For real? x) Of course it's my opinion, what are your own comments about "silly gifs" and "useless early internet" if not an opinion?Seriously...
Re:Bad Actors Are Grooming LLMs to Produce Falsehoods
by suspended_state on Saturday July 12, 2025 @07:36PM
(#44546163)
That might be a lack of understanding from my part. I had the impression from your comment that you were implying that there was (and is) hope in internet development (ie. many people hold a positive opinion about it), but there cannot be any hope in LLMs (ie. nobody can build a positive opinion about it, because presumably some hard fact prevents it).
As for what I said, I was just mimicking the comment of GP, which I'll quote here:
> The internet actually enabled us to do new things. AI is nothing of that sort. It just generates mediocre statistically-plausible text.
I could just do the same as GP, and qualify MUDs and BBS as poor proxies for social interactions that are much more elaborate and vibrant in person.