Re:Benchmarks of Cassandra, HBase, VoltDB, MySql, Voldemort ...
by lucian1900 on Thursday August 30, 2012 @05:06AM
(#4453733)
I think they wanted to discriminate between them on tasks where someone might reasonably decide for either of them.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Benchmarks of Cassandra, HBase, VoltDB, MySql, Voldemort ...
by rb2k_ on Thursday August 30, 2012 @06:17AM
(#4453902)
I haven't seen those usecases yet.
Either you want to scale over multiple systems or you don't. Either you have more data than RAM or you don't.
Re:Benchmarks of Cassandra, HBase, VoltDB, MySql, Voldemort ...
by michaelt on Thursday August 30, 2012 @07:10AM
(#4453998)
How about Hacker News, and more generally internet discussion forums?
Many discussion forums are SQL backed - but both Reddit and Digg are reported to use Cassandra, a NoSQL system.
Re:Benchmarks of Cassandra, HBase, VoltDB, MySql, Voldemort ...
by rb2k_ on Thursday August 30, 2012 @07:16AM
(#4454011)
In this case Redis would be the odd man out.
Unless you want to do manual sharding and replication, MySQL also is targeted at a different use-case. I also don't think anybody would run a 40 node mysql master-master cluster