I knew the Diddy party charges wouldn’t stick because the aggrieved persons descriptions sound like commonly held parties in Los Angeles with quite a lot of consent involved (and courts aren't able to parse more nuanced aspects of consent, so people are left with a reliance on mutual cooperation)

this detail isn’t as important to people as wondering if I’ve gone to an LA sex party and whatever preconception they have of that and now me

Just like those bankers, and this thread, there is always a party