Re:Ptar: Replacing .tgz for petabyte-scale S3 archives
by mrflop on Wednesday July 09, 2025 @10:54AM
(#44510759)
S3 buckets can just vanish for lots of reasons. With AWS’s shared-responsibility model, you’re the one who has to back up and protect your data not AWS.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Ptar: Replacing .tgz for petabyte-scale S3 archives
by fpoling on Wednesday July 09, 2025 @11:38AM
(#44511401)
The hold in compliance mode with AWS is accepted way to persist data that a company obliged to hold legally by US requirements.
And if your company has a sale contract with AWS the buckets cannot just vanish or AWS cannot close the account at arbitrary moment.