Re:A non-anthropomorphized view of LLMs
by lostmsu on Tuesday July 08, 2025 @01:31PM
(#44502172)
It's much simpler than that. X is in B therefore X is not in A is what being said, and this statement simply doesn't make sense unless you have a separate proof that A and B don't intersect.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
There are no comments on this comment yet.