Anthropic downloaded over 7M pirated books to train Claude, a judge said

Re:Anthropic downloaded over 7M pirated books to train Claud... by conradev on Tuesday July 08, 2025 @12:52PM (#44501774)

  DAWs are tools made to create music, generally. They do not contain banks of copyrighted materials to which the user ultimately pulls the copying "trigger" (that's the system I described).

You are quite literally describing sample packs (which are copyrighted). The only difference is that they figured out a fair licensing scheme for those. Is my understanding of copyright law wrong or poor here?

Imagine we invented some new hypothetical technology to take all of the sample packs in the world as input and produce new sample packs that humans haven't thought of before. Should we figure out how to license those packs fairly or pretend we never invented it?

Only so many artists have the patience to make each drum from scratch.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Anthropic downloaded over 7M pirated books to train Claud... by freejazz on Tuesday July 08, 2025 @01:12PM (#44501975)

Sure, except that sample packs are original materials by their author (as opposed to whatever Suno contains, which is other people's work). And yes, I imagine that sample packs come with a license to use the samples commercially. Otherwise there would be no market for them. I just did some brief searching and it looks like some sample packs even require royalty kick-backs. So, yeah.

[ Parent | on HN ]